Scattered records, put in order
Records held by different sites, providers and teams are gathered into one sequence.
Evidence of what AI agents actually did
When an AI agent acts, the people affected often cannot see what it did, or each party sees something different. Arkna rebuilds what the agent did from records it did not write.
Book a conversation
An agent’s account of its actions is a claim, not a record
Agents write their own logs and summaries, and those can differ from what happened. Outside records, the ones the agent did not write (e.g. a website’s edit history, a provider’s logs or a deploy record), capture what changed in the world.
Two accounts on one timeline
We call each rebuilt incident a Case. A Case sets what the agent said it did beside what the outside records show, in time order, so the points where they disagree are visible.
What a Case gives the people involved
One account every party can check
The operator, the people affected and any reviewer work from the same cited sources.
Findings graded against the records
Each finding states how far the outside records support it.
What the records can and cannot show
A rebuild is only as complete as the records that survive. Each Case names the records it used, the ones it could not reach and the questions that remain open. It does not certify safety or compliance.
Has an agent done something nobody can account for?
Tell us what happened and which records exist. Before any work begins, we will say what a rebuild could establish.
Book a conversationFrom our research: What it takes for an AI agent incident to become public